Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Fourth one dayer!  (Read 2677 times)
Johno

Offline Offline

Posts: 5927




Ignore
« on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 06:56:26 »

well well well

i knew me getting up at 6am would pay off one day.

england are currently bowling and have pakistan 38-3!  Beers

1st wicket was a run out by solanki, great fielding

2nd wicket was younis khan for a golden duck. went to leave it and inside edged it onto his stumps off flintoffs bowling.

3rd wicket was a type of off spin delivery by anderson which knocked akmals off stump, straight through the gap.

excellent  Smiley
Logged
STFC Village

« Reply #1 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 10:46:12 »

Pakistan bowled all out for 210! Yes

England currently 24-2! :shake:
Logged
STFC Village

« Reply #2 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 11:29:26 »

Despite losing another wicket, a slight revival, 70-3.

Fred and Tresco at the crease, come on boys!
Logged
STFC Village

« Reply #3 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 11:34:48 »

Everytime i post, they take another wicket! :x

Tresco gone, 70-4
Logged
fatbury

« Reply #4 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 11:56:52 »

stop bloody posting!
Logged
STFC Village

« Reply #5 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 11:58:29 »

NO
Logged
mattboyslim

« Reply #6 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 12:29:20 »

Total Shambles

108-7, 103 needed!  Am I right in thinking that the sub system effectively means you have to name your team assuming you will win the toss? We named Bell in the side then had to switch before the match started for Anderson.  That doesn't entirely seem like a fair system, as if we'd done it the other way Anderson could've bowled then Bell could have replaced him for our innings.  Have they no thought it through or am I missing something?
Logged
fatbury

« Reply #7 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 12:35:07 »

awful again! Ashes is long forgotten!
Logged
Spud

« Reply #8 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 12:44:13 »

Quote from: "mattboyslim"
Total Shambles

108-7, 103 needed!  Am I right in thinking that the sub system effectively means you have to name your team assuming you will win the toss? We named Bell in the side then had to switch before the match started for Anderson.  That doesn't entirely seem like a fair system, as if we'd done it the other way Anderson could've bowled then Bell could have replaced him for our innings.  Have they no thought it through or am I missing something?


They shouldnt even be allowed a fucking sub in ODI's!, keet it 11 Vs 11 and if people dont like it then they dont have to fucking watch it!.  :evil:
Logged
Spud

« Reply #9 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 13:13:50 »

Why the fuck did Blackwell run sideways?. stupid cunt. :evil:
Logged
STFC Village

« Reply #10 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 14:01:36 »

All over, Ali and Anderson gave it a good go, wonderful catch to remove Jimmy though. Pakistan have won the ODI series 3-1, with one to play.
Logged
fatbury

« Reply #11 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 14:02:30 »

useless bastards .. if Kabir Ali can get that many why cant the bloody batsman bat!
Logged
Spud

« Reply #12 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 14:02:36 »

Kabir Ali 2nd top scorer, says it all really.  :?
Logged
Johno

Offline Offline

Posts: 5927




Ignore
« Reply #13 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 15:38:44 »

Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC"
Why the fuck did Blackwell run sideways?. stupid cunt. :evil:


yeh cause the rest of the team did well in batting? really have to lay off him and give him his due sometimes.

the run out was stupid though, i was as annoyed as the next person but to be honest, he is really in the team as a spinner and part time batsman. tresco, prior, strauss, collingwood need to hit the runs.

bravo on ali and anderson though, espically ali, brilliant stuff.
Logged
Spud

« Reply #14 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 17:56:07 »

Quote from: "Johno"
Quote from: "Spuddy_STFC"
Why the fuck did Blackwell run sideways?. stupid cunt. :evil:


yeh cause the rest of the team did well in batting? really have to lay off him and give him his due sometimes.

the run out was stupid though, i was as annoyed as the next person but to be honest, he is really in the team as a spinner and part time batsman. tresco, prior, strauss, collingwood need to hit the runs.

bravo on ali and anderson though, espically ali, brilliant stuff.


I didnt say the rest of the team did well now did i!, they were in a good position with Blackwell there, he ran himself out by not running straight.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Print
Jump to: