I very much doubt we've heard the last of Hicks and Gillett, especially as they've said they're going to be suing (RBS and the other Liverpool directors, I guess) for £1bn on the basis that they've sold the club too cheaply. They appear to have a point as if the press are to be believed there were others willing to pay in excess of the £300m that NESV have and other options were on the table.
No one was willing to pay the £800m Hicks wanted. The only alleged offers were only around £20m more than NESV paid for Liverpool.
The fact is if RBS wasn't paid their money today, they could've taken ownership of the club and put the club into admin and could've potentially sold for less than the £300m that NESV paid, and Hicks and Gillett would've still lost their £144m. Personally Hicks and Gillett have no case. They knew that they had 6 months to sell the club in April, but no solid offers came in until NESV did. Hicks tried to borrow money to pay off RBS from a hedge fund, but Broughton and co. refused to go down that road again as they would've been in the same place in a few months time.
I'm now waiting for the Glazers trying to find £700m in a few years time to pay off the loan and hedge funds.