Thetownend.com

Who do reckon is in the clique then?

I reckon William Hague is partial to a rent boy or two,  looks the type

When he first started out he probably was the rent boy

Looking like the wicked witch knew about it too.
They're repulsive enough being Tories let alone this.

The same one that spent eight consecutive new years with Saville? Can't see her having a clue.

She can add that to covering up Hillsborough and the Miners Strike. What a diamond.

................are we talking about Harriet Harman ?

Nice but dim?  :hmmm:

And her husband.

Jeez people are banging on about the possibility of some Tories being involved when these 2 shitheads were involved in the PIE.

Except they weren't, were they? They worked for the NCCL which completely failed to deal properly with PIE, but it's still a good way from being involved with it. On that basis, the Home Office at the time was considerably more "involved" with PIE, is every civil servant who worked in the Home Office in the 70s and 80s a nonce?

If even half the rumours are true, there's enough genuine paedos and child rapists on both sides of the political spectrum to keep the courts busy for some time to come, without needing to drag smear stories into it.

I think you mean that in the 70's, whilst Harman and her husband were on the board of Liberty, they actively campaigned for PIE (Paedophile Information Exchange) to reduce the legal age of consent.

The whole policial spectrum don't come out smelling of roses in all this.

Sadly a lot of people are already using it for a game party political point scoring 

no matter what your political preferance, it seems to be something that crosses party political lines

Allthough, UKIP, the BNP, the Greens and the Monster Raving luny party are as yet untouched

You're kidding aren't you? BNP is nonce central.

Ian Si'Ree...

Laughed about Hague but on a serious level the publicity generated by public enquiries can prejudice the possibility of a subsequent "fair trial".

The appointed Butler-Sloss was related to Nigel Havers the attorney general at the time the decisions not to pursue the paedo allegations were taken. 

As a former judge the "conflict of interest" would have been glaringly obvious to her and as the Home secretary this should have been taken on board by May too.

Are the pair of them ignorant, arrogant or just ****s? 

Regardless our money has been wasted on a stupid and rightly abortive appointment by these buffoons and we're in for years of hot air at our expense. 

It was also interesting to read the allegation that one abuse victim has been reported as saying that Butler Sloss had persuaded him to agreeing to leave out any reference to a prominent C of E cleric from a paedo report BS was preparing because she quite liked the church and feared the wrong sort of publicity would be attracted.  The Establishment investigating the Establishment.

If you want to understand the result of market research, ask who paid for it.  For Public Enquiries we pay for them, so to predict or understand the result, ask instead who commissioned the Public Enquiry. 

I would have preferred to have seen a discreet and assiduous investigation by the Met and, if wrongdoing were uncovered (which is not yet a fact) for arrests and trials of the accused to have been pursued - untainted by the pre publicity of a Public Enquiry (and if you're no fan of the Met, I can see there are downsides there too!)

A pitchfork mob at Westminster may be as reliable a way at getting at the truth and justice?

.

[quote author=RedRag link=topic=54744.msg1280476#msg1280476 date=

The appointed Butler-Sloss was related to Nigel Havers the attorney general at the time the decisions not to pursue the paedo allegations were taken.  

.Sir Michael Havers was the attorney general,Nigel Havers was the one slipping Audrey Roberts a crippler in Corrie
[/quote]

As he was staring in Don't Wait Up for much of the time,  I suspect you mean Nigel Havers father who was attorney general during this period?

Woops :-[

Quite right, Nigel was never Attorney General

PS
I genuinely don't know whether or not we can say Michael never slipped La Roberts anything.

Brother/Sister aren't they?