DiV
Has also heard this
 Offline
Posts: 32327
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 11:33:23 » |
|
No Duke was a left back playing at left back. David Duke was not a fucking left back..... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #31 on: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 11:34:30 » |
|
He's as much a left back as anything else dv.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #32 on: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 11:39:26 » |
|
He certainly weren't much of a winger... after 5 seasons at LB you'd have thought he'd get better at it too. I for one am glad he's gone.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32327
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #33 on: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 15:22:26 » |
|
Duke was certainly a better winger than left back.
He was always good going forward, or have I been watching something totally different?!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #34 on: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 15:31:02 » |
|
Yes. He couldn't take people on or cross. Having said that, Shakes can't cross either. I blame the CG pitch...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #35 on: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 15:39:37 » |
|
Why are we so obsessed with daisy all of a sudden?I know its a forum so for it to work we have to have things to discuss  .But i'm bored by the whole David Duke thing now,can't we all just except the idea that he has gone and get on with thinking about Swindon now? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #36 on: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 15:49:44 » |
|
Why are we so obsessed with daisy all of a sudden?I know its a forum so for it to work we have to have things to discuss .But i'm bored by the whole David Duke thing now,can't we all just celebrate the idea that he has gone and get on with thinking about Swindon now?
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #37 on: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 16:00:49 » |
|
Well said Matt Please for the sake of the forum can't all of us Duke lovers and haters just forgive and forget ,lets try and let our wounds heal and put daisy firmly in the past ,where he belongs[until next season when we play Darlington that is :-))( ] |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #38 on: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 19:54:51 » |
|
He's as much a left back as anything else dv. you make me cringe this days :x |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #39 on: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 19:57:55 » |
|
for me it will have to be Grant Smith. Put in alot of effort and scored vital goals. who knows if he would have done it this season!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32327
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #40 on: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 21:07:20 » |
|
Yes. He couldn't take people on or cross. Having said that, Shakes can't cross either. I blame the CG pitch... Duke could do both?! He could damn well cross! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
 Online
Posts: 15993
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #41 on: Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 21:13:26 » |
|
Smith definitely.
Was on top form, scoring and providing goals with the odd hard challenge thrown in for good measure.
Then went to City and ruined his "career" :-))(
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
