Who knows Bambi? I'm sure those in attendance would have better knowledge.
Oh without a doubt, although there is a lot of evidence from psychologists and suchlike that very often, us humans do tend to remember things differently to how they actually occurred.
There have been numerous studies where a faux robbery or mugging occurs. They secretly film it all and then get all the witnesses back and question them. What is often revealing is that when there are apparent holes in the memory, instead of people saying "I don't know" they often will fill that part in and make it up. Thinking they are being more helpful, providing an answer rather than no answer. Of course, this results in lots of similar stories but many different versions regarding key points "Was he wearing a grey jumper or a green one?", "What weapon was she brandishing?".
But it also reveals it can be helpful when determining collusion. When all parties come up with the exact same set of answers and story. What might seem clever from the suspects can raise suspicion. Purely because of the "filling in bits" above, they expect to always see some muddiness.
So it begs the question, would people who are present necessarily have better knowledge than someone who sees all of the footage (I'm not meaning a short clip) at hand? I imagine, that this is one of the reasons why the police do now have body cams, so any "holes" can be revealed and stitched back together.