Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #90 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 10:15:16 » |
|
Ive seen myself on the big screen. Im on there quite a lot. Just the other times Ive got shades or a hat on. Or both.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Scot Munroe
|
|
« Reply #91 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 11:00:02 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #92 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 12:39:17 » |
|
Ive seen myself on the big screen. Im on there quite a lot. Just the other times Ive got shades or a hat on. Or both. Your only on there because your sat near the mighty personage that is Jimmy
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house There was only one thing I ever dreamed about And fate has just Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #93 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 12:41:35 » |
|
Can't bear the thought of watching,when we're down under ignorance tends to be bliss If i don't see it it couldn't possible have happened is how i deal with it
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house There was only one thing I ever dreamed about And fate has just Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #94 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 14:24:24 » |
|
i'm far from an expert but...
it wasn't too discouraging. the second innings wasn't too bad - bar the late collapse but tailenders facing clarke, lee, mcgrath and warne won't stand much of a chance anyway - collingwood and kp both nearly hit a century and both cook and jones had a decent knock.
we just need to take some wickets in adelaide now.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #95 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 21:09:40 » |
|
i think we'll see Panesar playing in the next one with Giles as well. Anderson to be left out
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Scot Munroe
|
|
« Reply #96 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 21:57:08 » |
|
i think we'll see Panesar playing in the next one with Giles as well. Anderson to be left out Yeah agree with you Rich. Also i think the Aussie are going to call up Stuart Macgill. They might drop Stuart Clark.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #97 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 22:01:52 » |
|
i think it would do us good to play 2 spinners. it seems to me like we are wasting a bowler but playing Anderson. i think we would have bowled a bit better at the Gabba with Monty in the side
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #98 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 10:23:20 » |
|
Love it, England say they might call up an extra spinner, so what do the Aussies do, drop MacGill from the squad and retain Clark.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #99 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 15:40:58 » |
|
Love it, England say they might call up an extra spinner, so what do the Aussies do, drop MacGill from the squad and retain Clark. Yeah but then the convicts only spinner in their squad is one of the best ever :roll: lets face it Warne could bowl us out almost by himself,don't think they need Stewie even on a turning pitch tbh. We on the other hand could replace Jimmy with Monty,so we don't lengthen the tail and more importantly stand more chance of getting those twenty wickets. I do fear that there's a lot of pressure on Monty,but then i guess thats what the test cricket and especially the Ashes is all about,coping with the pressure.
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house There was only one thing I ever dreamed about And fate has just Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #100 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 16:03:25 » |
|
Providing no injuries id go with this lot :-
Cook Strauss Bell Pietersen Collingwood Flintoff G Jones Giles Hoggard Harmison Panesar
With Mahmood as 12th man !
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority
Offline
Posts: 14666
|
|
« Reply #101 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 16:20:48 » |
|
Providing no injuries id go with this lot :-
Cook Strauss Bell Pietersen Collingwood Flintoff G Jones Giles Hoggard Harmison Panesar
With Mahmood as 12th man ! Do you think that team has 20 wickets in it ? NMH
|
|
|
Logged
|
You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #102 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 16:34:33 » |
|
With Mahmood as 12th man !
Maybe not,thick convict cunts :x http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/6190632.stm
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house There was only one thing I ever dreamed about And fate has just Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
Scot Munroe
|
|
« Reply #103 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 19:42:50 » |
|
Providing no injuries id go with this lot :-
Cook Strauss Bell Pietersen Collingwood Flintoff G Jones Giles Hoggard Harmison Panesar
That would be the team i would pick aswell. :england:
With Mahmood as 12th man !
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #104 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 19:58:44 » |
|
that will be the team i reckon. lets hope we bowl a bit better this time. the toss in this game is huge. we need to win it and bat first. if we lose this test we are fucked and the Ashes are back with the convicts
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|