Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 [7] 8   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: First test-Brisbane  (Read 14212 times)
Spencer_White

« Reply #90 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 10:15:16 »

Ive seen myself on the big screen. Im on there quite a lot. Just the other times Ive got shades or a hat on. Or both.
Logged
Scot Munroe

« Reply #91 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 11:00:02 »

Highlights of Day 5

http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid316007548?bclid=326745279&bctid=331187170

Jones and Giles bated well.
Logged
larwood
The girl least likely to.

Offline Offline

Posts: 4653





Ignore
« Reply #92 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 12:39:17 »

Quote from: "Spencer_White"
Ive seen myself on the big screen. Im on there quite a lot. Just the other times Ive got shades or a hat on. Or both.

Your only on there because your sat near the mighty personage that is Jimmy Cool
Logged

I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
larwood
The girl least likely to.

Offline Offline

Posts: 4653





Ignore
« Reply #93 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 12:41:35 »

Quote from: "SwindonUltra"


Can't bear the thought of watching,when we're down under ignorance tends to be bliss Sad If i don't see it it couldn't possible have happened is how i deal with it  Wink  Sad
Logged

I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
sonic youth

« Reply #94 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 14:24:24 »

i'm far from an expert but...

it wasn't too discouraging. the second innings wasn't too bad - bar the late collapse but tailenders facing clarke, lee, mcgrath and warne won't stand much of a chance anyway - collingwood and kp both nearly hit a century and both cook and jones had a decent knock.

we just need to take some wickets in adelaide now.
Logged
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant

Offline Offline

Posts: 15863




Ignore
« Reply #95 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 21:09:40 »

i think we'll see Panesar playing in the next one with Giles as well. Anderson to be left out
Logged
Scot Munroe

« Reply #96 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 21:57:08 »

Quote from: "Rich"
i think we'll see Panesar playing in the next one with Giles as well. Anderson to be left out


Yeah agree with you Rich. Also i think the Aussie are going to call up Stuart Macgill. They might drop Stuart Clark.
Logged
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant

Offline Offline

Posts: 15863




Ignore
« Reply #97 on: Monday, November 27, 2006, 22:01:52 »

i think it would do us good to play 2 spinners. it seems to me like we are wasting a bowler but playing Anderson. i think we would have bowled a bit better at the Gabba with Monty in the side
Logged
janaage
People's Front of Alba

Offline Offline

Posts: 14825





Ignore
« Reply #98 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 10:23:20 »

Love it, England say they might call up an extra spinner, so what do the Aussies do, drop MacGill from the squad and retain Clark.
Logged
larwood
The girl least likely to.

Offline Offline

Posts: 4653





Ignore
« Reply #99 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 15:40:58 »

Quote from: "janaage"
Love it, England say they might call up an extra spinner, so what do the Aussies do, drop MacGill from the squad and retain Clark.

Yeah but then the convicts only spinner in their squad is one of the best ever  :roll: lets face it Warne could bowl us out almost by himself,don't think they need Stewie even on a turning pitch tbh.

We on the other hand could replace Jimmy with Monty,so we don't lengthen the tail and more importantly stand more chance of getting those twenty wickets.
I do fear that there's a lot of pressure on Monty,but then i guess thats what the test cricket and especially the Ashes is all about,coping with the pressure.
Logged

I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
fatbury

« Reply #100 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 16:03:25 »

Providing no injuries id go with this lot :-

Cook
Strauss
Bell
Pietersen
Collingwood
Flintoff
G Jones
Giles
Hoggard
Harmison
Panesar

With Mahmood as 12th man !
Logged
Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority

Offline Offline

Posts: 14666





Ignore
« Reply #101 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 16:20:48 »

Quote from: "fatbury"
Providing no injuries id go with this lot :-

Cook
Strauss
Bell
Pietersen
Collingwood
Flintoff
G Jones
Giles
Hoggard
Harmison
Panesar

With Mahmood as 12th man !


Do you think that team has 20 wickets in it ?

NMH
Logged

You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
larwood
The girl least likely to.

Offline Offline

Posts: 4653





Ignore
« Reply #102 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 16:34:33 »

Quote from: "fatbury"


With Mahmood as 12th man !

Maybe not,thick convict cunts :x http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/6190632.stm
Logged

I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
Scot Munroe

« Reply #103 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 19:42:50 »

Quote from: "fatbury"
Providing no injuries id go with this lot :-

Cook
Strauss
Bell
Pietersen
Collingwood
Flintoff
G Jones
Giles
Hoggard
Harmison
Panesar

 That would be the team i would pick aswell.  :england:

With Mahmood as 12th man !
Logged
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant

Offline Offline

Posts: 15863




Ignore
« Reply #104 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 19:58:44 »

that will be the team i reckon. lets hope we bowl a bit better this time. the toss in this game is huge. we need to win it and bat first. if we lose this test we are fucked and the Ashes are back with the convicts
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 [7] 8   Go Up
Print
Jump to: