Chubbs
 Offline
Posts: 10517
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 10:26:38 » |
|
unlikely i know, but if you can get to bath i've got one you can borrow
im on my way!! just messing, i've managed to source one, but cheers anyway |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 15997
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #31 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 10:34:06 » |
|
If we lose, I think our fans may commit mass suicide. Unfortunately, with the number of players missing or doubtful and the Gas in good form we'll struggle to a point in front of 9500, with the gas filling the Arkells with 1200
I think 9500 is a bit optimistic. I'd love to be proven wrong, but I'm expecting less than 9000 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Panda Paws
|
|
« Reply #32 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 10:44:40 » |
|
I think 9500 is a bit optimistic. I'd love to be proven wrong, but I'm expecting less than 9000
Just thinking of the Plymouth game. Rovers should bring a few more than muff. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
Offline
Posts: 59512
Things can only get better
|
|
« Reply #33 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 10:47:17 » |
|
I think 9500 is a bit optimistic. I'd love to be proven wrong, but I'm expecting less than 9000
I agree, I recon 8,500 is nearer the mark IMO. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
|
stfcinbmth
|
|
« Reply #34 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 11:03:35 » |
|
I've gone 2-1, I stick by my prediction league score
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
land_of_bo
|
|
« Reply #35 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 11:06:36 » |
|
I'm taking a rovers mate. Fuck I hope we win.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jb
Offline
Posts: 800
|
|
« Reply #36 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 11:24:11 » |
|
1-0 Town JD
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ardiles
Offline
Posts: 11528
Stirlingshire Reds
|
|
« Reply #37 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 11:27:39 » |
|
We're so inconsistent at the moment that none of us has a clue which version of our squad is going to show up. So trying to make a prediction is futile, in my view. (Although if you were going to push me, I'd say it's probably going to be 3-1 to them, a draw, or 2-0 to us.)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The_Plagiarist
|
|
« Reply #38 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 11:30:06 » |
|
they beat us tonight and it doesn't look good does it, thats why we'll turn it on and spank them
season starts here - we owe them from last season... off the pitch we still owe them for the inn on the green episode but I'll leave that to our single celled supporters
Three nil town
COME ON YOU FUCKING REDs
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bert1981
Offline
Posts: 155
|
|
« Reply #39 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 12:07:02 » |
|
We really need to win tonight! Putting aside the fact it's a local derby and we owe them big time for last season, a win would get us looking at the right end of the table, we are a bit too close to the bottom at the moment.
Wouldn't risk Charlie, I can see them trying to rough him up and we don't want another Barry Corr situation on our hands. Fingers crossed the team that took care of Huddersfield will turn up as opposed to the one that surrendered at Dagenham.
Don't think there will be much of a crowd, but should still be a decent atmosphere under the lights, definitely looking forward to it, albeit with a touch of trepidation.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32350
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #40 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 12:09:27 » |
|
3-0 to Rovers.
If Charlie is fit he should play, otherwise our team hasnt got enough goals in it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Anteater
Offline
Posts: 1167
|
|
« Reply #41 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 12:10:11 » |
|
1 - 2  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jb
Offline
Posts: 800
|
|
« Reply #42 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 12:12:48 » |
|
1 - 2 I hope this is superstition  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Anteater
Offline
Posts: 1167
|
|
« Reply #43 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 12:14:30 » |
|
I hope this is superstition Yep ! got all mine wrong so far ! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jb
Offline
Posts: 800
|
|
« Reply #44 on: Monday, October 11, 2010, 12:16:25 » |
|
Formation wise, I'd say same as Torquay, Ball, Ritchie and Pericard up top
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
