|
SwindonTownFC
|
 |
« on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 16:31:28 » |
|
what will iffy play then??
says in the adver Benjamin will start along with Peacock and Cureton which if he goess 433 means no shakes
ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stfc11
 Offline
Posts: 882
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 16:32:51 » |
|
apparently pook is starting too
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
land_of_bo
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 16:33:23 » |
|
*throws the towel in*
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonTownFC
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 16:33:46 » |
|
so midfield 3 will be Migs Pook and Brown
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 16:34:50 » |
|
*throws the towel in*  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 16:47:07 » |
|
 Have to say that was my first reacton to Bo's comment Spud  Its not looking good is it  Who's going tonight?I think a crowd of anything over 3500 will shock me,a piss poor decision by the club to play when most people would probably prefer to watch Chelsea lose.Its going to be shite  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house
There was only one thing I ever dreamed about
And fate has just
Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55422
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 17:04:21 » |
|
I can't believe the speed of the re-arrangement. I'm sure the Tranmere travel club were equally delighted.
I'd prefer to be there, but babysitting duty while the wife is at a meeting means I will watch Chelsea lose and listen to Town on t'internet.
As for a midfield of Migs Pook and Brown, when the midfield is piss poor why make it weaker? Hooooof.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10011
Git facked
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 17:05:13 » |
|
How does that mean no Shakes?
It could mean...
Evans
Jenks Gurney Seano Nicho
Shakes Pook Brown
Cureton Benjamin Peacock
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32331
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 17:08:07 » |
|
I hope his choice of midfield three play well tonight, you can diss Pook all you want but he cant possibly do ANY worse than our midfield have done recently.
Hopefully no Shakes, but a very narrow 3 means no width.
Unless he plans to go 3-4-3 :shock:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 17:18:26 » |
|
Fuck me this is gonna be interesting, well until kick off anyway, then it'll descend into the norm.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
my-velocity
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 17:51:34 » |
|
How does that mean no Shakes?
It could mean...
Evans
Jenks Gurney Seano Nicho
Shakes Pook Brown
Cureton Benjamin Peacock I like that, we know most of the players can put in good performances. Let's just hope that if Pook plays he is MOTM |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32331
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 17:53:43 » |
|
How does that mean no Shakes?
It could mean...
Evans
Jenks Gurney Seano Nicho
Shakes Pook Brown
Cureton Benjamin Peacock I like that, we know most of the players can put in good performances. Let's just hope that if Pook plays he is MOTM I dont think that team is good at all, this is what I would play....and bare in mind I am no manager Evans Smith Gurney O'Hanlon Nicho Miglioranzi (no other option) Whalley Brown Cureton Peacock Roberts (over Benji purely because Roberts can be an emergency winger if need be) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
McLovin
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 18:04:14 » |
|
We are constantly outplayed in midfield, so in my eyes, a 3 man midfield is asking for trouble.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
my-velocity
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 18:05:05 » |
|
What i would like to have (changed my mind) is:
Evans
Jenkins
Gurney
O'Hanlon
Nicholas
Shakes
Miglioranzi
Whalley
Brown
Cureton
Peacock
Subs: Bulman, Roberts, Benjamin, J.Smith, Pook
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32331
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday, March 7, 2006, 18:14:57 » |
|
why is everyone putting Jenks back in the team?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
