Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
 Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 19:05:58 » |
|
I would assume it was a knoll.
I only know of 2 knolls....one in Dallas, and one at the top of Croft Road. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Barnard
Offline
Posts: 735
|
|
« Reply #31 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 19:27:03 » |
|
I'm surpised you've missed 'Starve Knoll' at Compton Bassett, after all if you've ventured as far as Clevancy....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
@MacPhlea
Offline
Posts: 2321
|
|
« Reply #32 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 19:29:16 » |
|
I'm surpised you've missed 'Starve Knoll' at Compton Bassett, after all if you've ventured as far as Clevancy....
That's my back garden! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #33 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 19:34:25 » |
|
I'm surpised you've missed 'Starve Knoll' at Compton Bassett, after all if you've ventured as far as Clevancy....
Interesting....not something marked on the 50's map....whereas Townsend's Knoll was marked as an antiquity. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #35 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 19:42:24 » |
|
Isn't the internet a wonderful thing.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #36 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 20:02:44 » |
|
http://www.kch42.dial.pipex.com/keys_question.htmInteresting Reg....new to me but seems old maps would reference old ley line positions and Townsends Knoll was an important one,seems it was an earthworks shown on this graph,why Townsend i can only guess it was the man who identified it or the man who had land there,would be nice to find out. Interesting link,for me anyway!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
Offline
Posts: 8889
|
|
« Reply #37 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 20:23:48 » |
|
Bang, Cox goal!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Costanza
Offline
Posts: 10648
|
|
« Reply #38 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 20:26:26 » |
|
Bang, Cox goal!
Bless him, go Coxy! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
|
« Reply #39 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 20:27:03 » |
|
Another for the growing CV.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
|
« Reply #40 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 20:27:14 » |
|
Well happy
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #41 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 20:30:28 » |
|
http://www.kch42.dial.pipex.com/keys_question.htmInteresting Reg....new to me but seems old maps would reference old ley line positions and Townsends Knoll was an important one,seems it was an earthworks shown on this graph,why Townsend i can only guess it was the man who identified it or the man who had land there,would be nice to find out. Interesting link,for me anyway! However much it would be nice for there to be ley lines, it is in fact bollocks. Although interesting that Townsend's Knoll gets a mention. Another mystery site for me is Swanborough Tump...between Woodborough and Pewsey, another that has disappeared. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jutty274
Offline
Posts: 1863
|
|
« Reply #42 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 20:32:03 » |
|
Does anyone know if Simon Cox has still got his twitter account?
I went on to congratulate him on his goal and couldn't find him.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #43 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 20:34:08 » |
|
Does anyone know if Simon Cox has still got his twitter account?
I went on to congratulate him on his goal and couldn't find him.
He's playing football.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ginginho
Offline
Posts: 6865
|
|
« Reply #44 on: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 20:41:51 » |
|
How the fuck did the topic of knolls come up in a Simon Cox thread?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
