Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
 Offline
Posts: 27137
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 17:43:32 » |
|
I reckon we're win 2-1.
WE'LL FOR FUCK SAKE, WE'LL!!! You don't say "I reckon we are win 2-1", you say "I reckon we will win 2-1", you fucking imbecile. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #46 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 17:44:36 » |
|
Ime not happy about this
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #47 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 17:52:13 » |
|
We'll win 10-0.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36318
|
|
« Reply #48 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 17:53:26 » |
|
Play shit and win or like world beaters and lose - Ummmmmm
I didn't write that very well. I'd rather we played good football, got a bit unlucky and drew the game rather than play shit football and get the lucky draw when we should have lost. It's all down to momentum, we need full confidence going into these next couple of months. Clearly though three points over zero would be ace, no matter how they were gained. World beaters don't lose either. I think if we play at the top of our game we'll get a point as a minimum. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14187
|
|
« Reply #49 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 18:34:00 » |
|
WE'LL FOR FUCK SAKE, WE'LL!!!
You don't say "I reckon we are win 2-1", you say "I reckon we will win 2-1", you fucking imbecile.
Sorry I made a mistake. Twat. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16352
|
|
« Reply #50 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 18:47:28 » |
|
You're be lucky not to get banned with grammar like that
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
Barry Scott
Offline
Posts: 9113
|
|
« Reply #51 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 19:11:47 » |
|
You're be lucky not to get banned with grammar like that
*There'll be lucky... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #52 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 19:13:01 » |
|
Any team news yet?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32299
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #53 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 19:13:33 » |
|
No easton.
Ward playing. No idea if its a 442 or 451.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #54 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 19:14:38 » |
|
Just went on Thisis looks like Ward upfront with Austin and Marshall out wide left.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ralphy
Offline
Posts: 14187
|
|
« Reply #55 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 19:16:33 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Don Rogers Shop
|
|
« Reply #56 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 19:20:42 » |
|
Think it's 4-3-3  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic
Offline
Posts: 4156
|
|
« Reply #57 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 19:21:03 » |
|
No easton.
Ward playing. No idea if its a 442 or 451.
According to our sponsorship contract, we're not allowed to start a game with anything but 4-4-2 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #58 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 19:22:07 » |
|
Think it's 4-3-3 Really? Marshall, Ward and Austin upfront then. Fair play to Wilson if that's the case. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Barry Scott
Offline
Posts: 9113
|
|
« Reply #59 on: Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 19:23:42 » |
|
I just assumed that it's Ward and Austin up front, with Marshy and JPM on the wings. And that seems just the ticket to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
