hansgruber
 Offline
Posts: 1606
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 09:14:03 » |
|
Why do they keep picking that Rikki Clarke? He's shite
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3886
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 09:40:23 » |
|
Why do they keep picking that Rikki Clarke? He's shite i dont have them picking him its flecthers misuse of him thats the problem its exactly the same as it was for loudon not so long ago - they've picked a really class batsman who can bowl occasionally and play them as a bowler have to say we probably would have won if w'd have had yardy's darts as opposed to clarke's long hops |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hansgruber
Offline
Posts: 1606
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 09:45:27 » |
|
Thought Strauss fucked up the bowling changes as well. Lewis was our best bowler again, but he didn't finish his 10 overs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3886
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 09:56:38 » |
|
Thought Strauss fucked up the bowling changes as well. Lewis was our best bowler again, but he didn't finish his 10 overs. he would of done he would have bowled the last one so there was nothing wrong with that i thought under the circumstances (with saj and clarke bowling pie after pie) strauss did very well |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 11:18:05 » |
|
mahmood is rubbish, he's quick but he gets spanked around the park almost constantly. i'm far from an expert on the subject, but i haven't got a clue why they persist in picking him.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3886
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 11:34:50 » |
|
mahmood is rubbish, he's quick but he gets spanked around the park almost constantly. i'm far from an expert on the subject, but i haven't got a clue why they persist in picking him. he's obviously got the talent but is just young and raw, with more games he'll get better, or at least that's the theory i'd like to see hampshire's james bruce called up |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Scot Munroe
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 12:15:09 » |
|
or chris tremlett.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hansgruber
Offline
Posts: 1606
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 12:26:46 » |
|
Thought Strauss fucked up the bowling changes as well. Lewis was our best bowler again, but he didn't finish his 10 overs. he would of done he would have bowled the last one so there was nothing wrong with that i thought under the circumstances (with saj and clarke bowling pie after pie) strauss did very well but it never was going to go to the last over. That's my point. He needed to use his best bowler to take wickets. Rikki Clarke was never going to win us that game. Lewis at least would have given us a chance |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 12:33:23 » |
|
Quite frankly I dont want to see Rikki Clarke or Sajid Mahmood in that one day team again ... Kabir Ali was economical on the tour of India yet got dropped out .. ?? Why??
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3886
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 13:00:44 » |
|
Thought Strauss fucked up the bowling changes as well. Lewis was our best bowler again, but he didn't finish his 10 overs. he would of done he would have bowled the last one so there was nothing wrong with that i thought under the circumstances (with saj and clarke bowling pie after pie) strauss did very well but it never was going to go to the last over. That's my point. He needed to use his best bowler to take wickets. Rikki Clarke was never going to win us that game. Lewis at least would have given us a chance if clarke couldnt bowl the 35 over well then hes not going to bowl the 40th any better so surely it makes no difference |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3886
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 13:02:29 » |
|
Quite frankly I dont want to see Rikki Clarke or Sajid Mahmood in that one day team again ... Kabir Ali was economical on the tour of India yet got dropped out .. ?? Why??  kabir ali is many things; short, fat, a pie chucker, but no sir economical is certainly not one of them his RPO in india was 6.00 fyi |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 14:14:52 » |
|
Quite frankly I dont want to see Rikki Clarke or Sajid Mahmood in that one day team again ... Kabir Ali was economical on the tour of India yet got dropped out .. ?? Why?? You want Flabir Ali in the side!? :shock: You're either crazy or have never seen him bowl for England. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 18:29:18 » |
|
mahmood is rubbish, he's quick but he gets spanked around the park almost constantly. i'm far from an expert on the subject, but i haven't got a clue why they persist in picking him. because he's fucking quick, like you say. imagine the ball that did for afridi on a rock hard WACA pitch in the winter. unplayable. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Boeta
Offline
Posts: 3886
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 18:31:57 » |
|
mahmood is rubbish, he's quick but he gets spanked around the park almost constantly. i'm far from an expert on the subject, but i haven't got a clue why they persist in picking him. because he's fucking quick, like you say. imagine the ball that did for afridi on a rock hard WACA pitch in the winter. unplayable. waca's slow and low these days davido. more in it for monty than saj im afraid. this isnt the 80s you know |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hansgruber
Offline
Posts: 1606
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 18:51:01 » |
|
my point was that if our better bowlers were on and we bowled Pakistan out (which was our only chance of winning), Rikki Clarke wouldn't have had to bowl at all. It looked close on the scorecard but Pakistan were never in danger of losing that game.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
