Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Does a town the size of Swindon need 7 (seven) McDonald's?  (Read 8390 times)
Empathy Sloth

« Reply #45 on: Wednesday, October 30, 2013, 21:18:09 »

That's around £2.50 a day (£5 for the two of them) if we're taking a month to be on average 30 days. He runs a shoe shop but it's fair to say he gets hardly any trade, it's just something for him to do.
Logged
4D
Or not 4D that is the question

Offline Offline

Posts: 21946


I can't bear it 🙄




Ignore
« Reply #46 on: Wednesday, October 30, 2013, 21:27:40 »

This isn't in the UK though CF, is it? If not, what is cost of living like?
Logged
Empathy Sloth

« Reply #47 on: Wednesday, October 30, 2013, 21:34:39 »

When they've paid all their bills they're left with hardly anything, if my parents didn't help out financially I dread to think what the situation would be like.
Logged
4D
Or not 4D that is the question

Offline Offline

Posts: 21946


I can't bear it 🙄




Ignore
« Reply #48 on: Wednesday, October 30, 2013, 23:40:59 »

Is he a cobbler?
Logged
Bob's Orange
Has brain escape barriers

Offline Offline

Posts: 28571





Ignore
« Reply #49 on: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 00:04:37 »

Personally, I won't be happy until we get a Wagamama.

Went for one on Friday. Not bad food of you don't mind the dormitory esque seating.
Logged

we've been to Aberdeen, we hate the Hibs, they make us spew up, so make some noise,
the gorgie boys, for Hearts in Europe.
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!

Offline Offline

Posts: 14521



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #50 on: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 08:45:19 »

And they wonder why there are so many 'fatties' in the town....

Yes it brings jobs, but also brings rubbish. The amount of rubbish in North Swindon from Mac D's is awful.

I love it when people make this argument against fast food 'restaurants'. It's the low life customers dropping the rubbish who are to blame (and dropping litter is utterly low life behaviour in my opinion, I hate it). You can't blame McDonalds for it.
Logged
Paolo69

Offline Offline

Posts: 2790





Ignore
« Reply #51 on: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 09:00:26 »

I love it when people make this argument against fast food 'restaurants'. It's the low life customers dropping the rubbish who are to blame (and dropping litter is utterly low life behaviour in my opinion, I hate it). You can't blame McDonalds for it.

On that basis you can't blame a pub if it's customers are loud, abusive and obnoxious at kicking out time. Plenty of pubs do get blamed for this though, and in extreme circumstances threatened with closure/reduced hours.

Basically I think they do need to take some responsibility for the behaviour of their customers although as you rightly say it's the low life customers who do it who should shoulder most of the blame.
« Last Edit: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 09:04:28 by Paolo69 » Logged
Cookie

Offline Offline

Posts: 1232




Ignore
« Reply #52 on: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 09:38:53 »

Would the litter be there if the restaurant wasn't because if the answer is no then it's pretty obvious that the litter problem has arisen as a result of the restaurant, right? And if so then they should do something about that. How about paying for a street sweeper out of the vast corporate profits, it's not exactly asking too much especially when there's enough custom to open 7 fucking restaurants in one town. 

Burger King is nicer too.
Logged
Sippo
Living in the 80s

Offline Offline

Posts: 15587


I ain't gettin on no plane fool




Ignore
« Reply #53 on: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 09:39:59 »

I love it when people make this argument against fast food 'restaurants'. It's the low life customers dropping the rubbish who are to blame (and dropping litter is utterly low life behaviour in my opinion, I hate it). You can't blame McDonalds for it.

Not blaming McDonalds. It's the customers. Like I don't blame McDonalds for making people fat.

It's down to the individual. I just don't think we 'need' another one.
Logged

If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
JanTheMan

Offline Offline

Posts: 479




Ignore
« Reply #54 on: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 12:14:26 »

Could do with a Nandos....

Are they still planning on having one in Swindon?

The thing is, the Council don’t approve a chain restaurant whether it be MCD’s/BK/Nando's etc, instead they approve a use class.  In this case it will be A5 (takeaway), possibly A3 (restaurant).   So whilst the applicant may be proposing a what is viewed as a ‘bad food’ restaurant, the premises could also be used without formal permission as an artisan coffee house serving takeaway macaroons.  This is where supply and demand comes into the equation and why Oxford only has three MCDs and Swindon has seven.  As someone else pointed out, Swindon has a substantially higher proportion of MCD eaters, whereas Oxford has a substantially higher number of people willing to drink overpriced coffee and macaroons
« Last Edit: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 12:24:36 by JanTheMan » Logged
JanTheMan

Offline Offline

Posts: 479




Ignore
« Reply #55 on: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 12:23:54 »

I love it when people make this argument against fast food 'restaurants'. It's the low life customers dropping the rubbish who are to blame (and dropping litter is utterly low life behaviour in my opinion, I hate it). You can't blame McDonalds for it.

Completely agree with the above.  Nothing worse than watching some 6ft 4inch pikey blatantly drop litter as if he’s proud it.......And you can’t do a thing unless you actively want a kicking.  But this is not the fault of MCDs.

Following my last post, people who eat in MCDs are more likely to drop litter when compared with people who prefer expensive coffee.  Hence Oxford is a cleaner place than Swindon.  I appreciate this is a complete generalisation, but there’s a good reason we stereotype.
Logged
horlock07

Offline Offline

Posts: 18726


Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost




Ignore
« Reply #56 on: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 12:36:33 »

The thing is, the Council don’t approve a chain restaurant whether it be MCD’s/BK/Nando's etc, instead they approve a use class.  In this case it will be A5 (takeaway), possibly A3 (restaurant).   So whilst the applicant may be proposing a what is viewed as a ‘bad food’ restaurant, the premises could also be used without formal permission as an artisan coffee house serving takeaway macaroons.  This is where supply and demand comes into the equation and why Oxford only has three MCDs and Swindon has seven.  As someone else pointed out, Swindon has a substantially higher proportion of MCD eaters, whereas Oxford has a substantially higher number of people willing to drink overpriced coffee and macaroons

Christ you are not a planner as well
Logged
JanTheMan

Offline Offline

Posts: 479




Ignore
« Reply #57 on: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 13:04:06 »

Afraid so.  I used to work for an LPA in Surrey and it was amazing how many letters of objection would be submitted from the affluent white middle class majority.  All complaining about the proposed Indian restaurant (racism is alive and well in leafy surrey, that much I did learn).  But as mentioned earlier, planning permission has very little to do with type of food being cooked.  Funnily enough, the same surrey folk weren’t too bothered when a coffee house was proposed. 
Logged
horlock07

Offline Offline

Posts: 18726


Lives in Northern Bastard Outpost




Ignore
« Reply #58 on: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 13:10:38 »

Afraid so.  I used to work for an LPA in Surrey and it was amazing how many letters of objection would be submitted from the affluent white middle class majority.  All complaining about the proposed Indian restaurant (racism is alive and well in leafy surrey, that much I did learn).  But as mentioned earlier, planning permission has very little to do with type of food being cooked.  Funnily enough, the same surrey folk weren’t too bothered when a coffee house was proposed. 

Tell me about it, we do a lot of work for one of the big 4 supermarket chains and I would suggest that we would get much fewer objections if we worked for Waitrose!
Logged
JanTheMan

Offline Offline

Posts: 479




Ignore
« Reply #59 on: Thursday, October 31, 2013, 13:16:39 »

Tell me about it, we do a lot of work for one of the big 4 supermarket chains and I would suggest that we would get much fewer objections if we worked for Waitrose!

Yeah, I read a BBC article earlier in the week about the presence of Waitrose having a direct link to increased house prices.  As you say, if Mr Tesco wants a new store in say Marlborough, there will be 100’s of objections, propose a Waitrose and the locals/blue politicians will be right behind it (I appreciate Marlborough has both).
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
Print
Jump to: